Two emails from Warrior Naked Wrestler aka NW:

First email:

Naked Wrestler

We are men. We have Balls.

I do believe that there IS a masculine-identified-male-male element out there forming up. It's really always been around. The fag movement pretty much pushed it underground--for a while.

The Masculine-Identified Male seeks out his own kind to associate with. Masculine Males DO NOT seek out femininity in other males. Masculine Males enhance their masculinity by associating/competing with Masculine Males. That Masculinity is necessary for the process of pro-creation and evolution.

The butt-fuck guys want so much to be accepted as on-par with Normal, that they turned normal man2man aggression and bonding into something that had to go underground. For decades, just jacking off with another boy growing up was seen as "faggot" stuff (ie: not masculine).

But now the fight sports (masculine aggression and bonding) have brought man2man aggression and bonding back to life. One element of that (aside from full MMA) is Beach Wrestling, which is taking off rapidly (to the consternation of people in the Gay Games entourage).

Why? Because wrestling for a takedown in the outdoors IS SO natural and normal for males to do from the stand-up. It has been around longer than ANY sport in the History Of Man. That is what wrestling used to be for 1000's and 1000's and 1000's of years.

And it's coming back.

Wrestling does not need to be a "clique" or a "fetish" related to some sort of almost-male phenomenon. And let's not forget about all that stupid "points" / "action red" / "action blue" / let's add more and more stuff to the rules book shit that we've all complained about going to SF "gay wrestling" clinics. I finally took a serious look at all of it and decided it was not for me.

Yes wrestling, including wrestling in real old-school singlets IS cool. Wrestling IS erotic. The singlet IS erotic. Male-Male aggression with civility rules, buck naked (or semi-buck naked in a singlet) IS erotic. I DO admit it. Guys check each other out.

The problem with fags is that they just won't admit it. Neither will so-called "straight" wrestlers. There is this strange mental/social battle going on all the time which seeks to de-sexualize wrestling.

It CANNOT be done.

Wrestling is a physical contest between 2 sets of testicles and everything derived from them.

It's why males instinctively DON'T want to wrestle or fight girls. Guys want to wrestle with, fight with, and compete against guys. A male can only TEST his manhood against another male. And that aggression and urge to test male-ness is derived from being born with testicles and penises.

We are Men. We have balls.

Male sexuality is displayed on the OUTSIDE of the body. It's just the way it is. Some people--male and female--have a problem with that fact.

The fact is that the aggression in takedown wrestling is and has been attractive to the masculine male...Universally....since the Dawn of Man. AND the male-on-male aggression, AND the beauty of the male bodies doing the aggression, IS beautiful and sexually stimulating at the same time. It's all one big beautiful package. Some people--male and female--have a problem with that also.

Of course I'm still into guys. Any normal guy is into guys. It's the femmy-guy thing I can't really stand any more...Never could. I had taught myself to accept it all (Gay Wrestling, Gay Games, etc).

So it's a kind of "new direction" for me. Well it's not new.

I just finally one day admitted to myself that I don't like femininity in guys. I never did. I never liked it in myself. I had taught myself masculinity.

Working at Labor Jobs and Office Jobs alternately has taught me the difference; that might take time to explain later.

Gay Marriage (forced hetero-sexualization--a term I made up to describe such nonsense as Gay Marriage) is just one example of male femininity; what could sound more stupid than 2 men being husband and husband? Call me an ignoramus brute. Gay Marriage is Fagot Shit.

Anyway . . . A friend of mine wanted me to give an ex-wrestler some fag-wrestling shirts.

But I don't know if some real ex-wrestler from the midwest would really want fag-wrestling shirts. That guy my friend describes has obviously been in real-aggression wrestling matches (maybe he even got a normal hard-on, from time to time, from the man2man body contact and aggression--GOOD FOR HIM). I don't know if a guy like that really wants to advertise "gay" wrestling (and everything associated with "gay" wrestling) once he's been associated with masculine wrestling.

Each person has to make up his own mind.

NW

Bill Weintraub

Re: We are Men. We have Balls.

6-4-10

Thank you NW.

Guys, it's important -- very important -- that you read both emails from NW.

But I'll comment on this one first.

NW:

Wrestling is a physical contest between 2 sets of testicles and everything derived from them.

It's why males instinctively DON'T want to wrestle or fight girls. Guys want to wrestle with, fight with, and compete against guys. A male can only TEST his manhood against another male. And that aggression and urge to test male-ness is derived from being born with testicles and penises.

We are Men. We have balls.

Male sexuality is displayed on the OUTSIDE of the body. It's just the way it is. Some people--male and female--have a problem with that fact.

The fact is that the aggression in takedown wrestling is and has been attractive to the masculine male...Universally....since the Dawn of Man. AND the male-on-male aggression, AND the beauty of the male bodies doing the aggression, IS beautiful and sexually stimulating at the same time. It's all one big beautiful package. Some people--male and female--have a problem with that also.

First core point:

Wrestling is a physical contest between 2 sets of testicles and everything derived from them.

Right.

And I'd say all Fighting is a physical contest between 2 sets of testicles and everything derived from them.

That's what it's about.

And NW has terrific clarity about that.

In my reply to Charles' A Man knows what feels good to a Man, I talked about my own Balls against Balls Fight fantasies as an adolescent, and how they arose from somewhere deep within myself, without any input from the outside world.

It was my own innate understanding of the essentially Combative and Aggressive nature of Men, and my own instinctual relating of that to the testicles, which produced those fantasies and gave them so much power in my life.

Next point:

It's why males instinctively DON'T want to wrestle or fight girls. Guys want to wrestle with, fight with, and compete against guys. A male can only TEST his manhood against another male. And that aggression and urge to test male-ness is derived from being born with testicles and penises.

Right.

Just as heterosexualizing sex between Men makes no sense --

Heterosexualizing Fight Sport makes no sense.

It misses and/or seeks to destroy what Fight Sport is about.

Guys want to wrestle with, fight with, and compete against guys.

Right.

Just as guys want to have sex with guys -- and not pseudo-women --

So do guys want to wrestle with, FIGHT with, and compete against guys.

Because:

A male can only TEST his manhood against another male.

Right.

It's MANHOOD against MANHOOD.

WARRIOR against WARRIOR.

That's what being a MAN is about.

And it's biological:

And that aggression and urge to test male-ness is derived from being born with testicles and penises.

Right.

So again, NW returns to the male basics: testicles and penises.

We are Men. We have balls.

Male sexuality is displayed on the OUTSIDE of the body. It's just the way it is. Some people--male and female--have a problem with that fact.

The fact is that the aggression in takedown wrestling is and has been attractive to the masculine male...Universally....since the Dawn of Man. AND the male-on-male aggression, AND the beauty of the male bodies doing the aggression, IS beautiful and sexually stimulating at the same time. It's all one big beautiful package. Some people--male and female--have a problem with that also.

We are Men.

We have Balls.

Male sexuality is displayed on the OUTSIDE of the body.

It's visible.

It's visible because it's supposed to be.

When you make it invisible -- you create a problem -- actually, many problems.

The fact is that the aggression in takedown wrestling is and has been attractive to the masculine male...Universally....since the Dawn of Man. AND the male-on-male aggression, AND the beauty of the male bodies doing the aggression, IS beautiful and sexually stimulating at the same time. It's all one big beautiful package.

Right.

Men like Aggression.

It turns them on.

AND the male-on-male aggression, AND the beauty of the male bodies doing the aggression, IS beautiful and sexually stimulating at the same time. It's all one big beautiful package.

Right.

The aggression, and the beauty of the male bodies doing the aggression, is beautiful and sexually stimulating at the same time.

And then NW adds:

"Some people--male and female--have a problem with that."

Right.

And it's not just some people.

It's entire cultures and civilizations.

And yet -- we know that in the Western world, cultures and civilizations which do NOT have a problem with male genitality and male aggression -- outperform those who do.

That the citizens of such cultures and civilizations live better and are more creative, and more productive.

So -- at some point -- we don't know exactly when -- the Greeks started, in their great religious-athletic festivals, Wrestling and Fighting (and competing in track and field) -- Nude.

Probably somewhere about 776 BC.

And it's instructive that it's the Spartans who were believed to have invented nude exercise:

The Spartans were the first to exercise gymnoi [nude] and to disrobe in public and rub themselves with olive oil after they had exercised while gymnoi.

~ Thucydides

And of course the Spartans were nude for more than just exercise -- much of the Agogé and subsequent life was spent in the nude at Sparta.

But, it wasn't just Sparta -- as we'll see, most Greek Men were nude most of the time.

Including when they were Wrestling and Fighting, whether just in training, or in competition at their great religious-athletic festivals -- the Games.

And they continued that tradition of nudity in competition at the Games until 391 AD, when the Great and Catholic Emperor Theodosius I closed the Games -- permanently.

So that nudity in Fight Sport lasted more than a thousand years.

As I said, Greek Men also did other things nude -- they apparently did ordinary work, such as carpentry and farming -- nude --

And they very often fought in battle nude -- that is, with their male genitals exposed.

Even when they were wearing helmets to protect their heads and greaves to protect their lower legs and even breastplates to protect their upper torsos --

they still left their genitals exposed.

We have so many vase paintings and statues depicting that -- that there can be no doubt of it.

So the male genitals were exposed -- because they're SUPPOSED TO BE.

As NW says,

Male sexuality is displayed on the OUTSIDE of the body. It's just the way it is.

It's the way it is.

But people have a choice.

They can conceal those genitals.

Or they can HONOR them -- by leaving them visible and exposed.

And at some point the Greeks figured out that it was better for the male genitals to be visible and exposed and HONORED --

than to be hidden.

They realized that Life was better when Men were Nude.

And that Fighting was better -- when Men were Nude.

And around the same time that they came to that realization -- their entire civilization took off.

In a huge flowering of culture among what was actually a very small group of people-- a flowering known to historians as "the Greek miracle."

Male nudity -- and male nudity in Fight Sport -- which was tremendously important to the Greeks -- was not incidental to the Greek miracle.

It was intrinsic.

So -- in The Warrior Altruism of the Warrior God, I talked about how the Greeks incorporated the word "machos" -- fighter or fighting -- into proper names.

Names like Therimachos -- brutal fighter -- and Aristomachos -- best fighter -- and Thrasymachos -- bold fighter -- and Andromachos -- man fighter.

And there are a ton of these names:

Lampromachos = brilliant fighter

Nikomachos = victory fighter

Timomachos = honor fighter

Kleomachos = glory fighter

Pasimachos = all fighter

Protomachos = first fighter

Hippomachos = horse fighter

Eurymachos = wide-ranging fighter

Hagesimachos = leading fighter

Promachos = for fighter

Antimachos = against fighter

Kleitomachos = renowned fighter

Ischomachos = staunch fighter

Etc.

And there are also Greek names which incorporate one of the Greek words for the male genitals: "medes."

So there's a Spartan Hero names Eumedes = Good Male Genitals.

There's Ganymedes = Delighting in Male Genitals -- and Ganymedes is Zeus's immortal beloved.

There's Nikomedes = Victorious Male Genitals.

How could they do that?

Name a kid "good cock and balls"?

or "delighting in dick and nuts"?

or "victorious crank and sack"?

The answer is that they could do it because they saw the male genitals as being worthy not of shame, but of reverence and awe.

And they were right.

And having decided that the male genitals were deserving of reverence and awe, and having decided that Men should be Nude and displaying their male genitals as much as possible --

They created a huge amount of art depicting nude Men.

With, in particular, full, healthy, and robust ball sacs -- testicles.

These works of art were found everywhere in Greek and then Roman cities.

They were dominant.

It was a dominant culture of Nude, Testicular, Masculinity:

I repeat:

The Greeks and then the Romans lived in a dominant culture of Nude, Testicular, Masculinity.

And that culture, as every culture does, produced cultural messages --

in this case, cultural messages about the value of Nude, Testicular, Masculinity --

in the form of art -- statues and paintings.

These cultural messages reinforced the cultural reality -- that Men Fought -- and, much of the time, Lived -- Nude.

And that to do so was Good -- and more than Good -- it was HEROIC.

The images that you see, then, are images of Heroic, Nude, Testicular, Masculinity.

The Testicular part is important -- it's not incidental.

Remember: Eu-medes -- Good Male Genitals.

Gany-medes -- Delighting in Male Genitals.

Niko-medes -- Victorious Male Genitals.

The display of the Male Genitals -- and in particular the Testicles -- was essential.

Masculinity, Nudity -- including the Testicles --, and Heroism -- the Heroism of the Warrior-Athlete -- were inextricably linked in these images.

As they were in real life.

NW often speaks of Fighting and Freedom, and the relationship between Nude Fighting and Freedom.

He's correct.

In the ancient world, Nude, Testicular, Masculinity was the matrix and generator of Heroism -- Heroism in the service of Freedom.

You may think I'm overstating the Testicular part -- but I'm not -- and neither is NW.

It takes Balls to be a Warrior says NW.

The ancients agreed, and presented that reality in their art -- in image after image after image.

Question:

How many of these images sending that cultural message -- images in the form of statues, wall paintings, vase paintings, mosaics, etc. -- were there?

Answer: so many, that to us, it's virtually unimaginable.

Frequent readers of our pages see many of the same images repeated over and over again.

That's because only a relatively few of these images survived.

But we have literary evidence as to just how many there were.

For example, Pausanias, in his Guide to Greece, written around 170 AD, describes Olympia, home of the Olympic Games.

He first describes the various temples and shrines and their statuary and other decoration -- he describes that first because religion was his first interest.

And then he gets to the statues of Olympic victors.

He begins by telling us that the Roman emperor Nero, who ruled from 54 to 68 AD, had "taken" -- stolen is the better word -- five hundred -- yes, that's a five and two zeros -- of the best statues from Olympia to Rome.

But he proceeds to give brief descriptions of those statues which are left.

He emphasizes that he's not describing all the statues -- but only those which are of interest due either to their subject -- that is, the victor -- or the sculptor himself.

His description goes on for page after page after page -- fifty-two pages in my edition.

How many statues does he describe?

It's pointless to count, because he says this isn't an exhaustive list.

However, figuring an average of five per page, that's more than two hundred and fifty.

Assuming that there were another two hundred and fifty statues that he didn't think were worth mentioning, that would mean that ca 50 AD, there had been at least a thousand statues at Olympia -- alone.

You should take a look at Pausanias.

His book should be in any library, but it may also be available on Google Books under the title Guide to Southern Greece, edited by Peter Levi -- Book VI.

Because what he's describing is a veritable forest of statues -- virtually all of nude, male, athletes.

A forest.

Of Heroic, Nude, MEN.

This guy, for example, was an Olympic victor:

Note the testicles:

Then try to imagine living in a culture in which these sorts of adulatory and hortatory images -- were everywhere.

Along with Herms and other Phallic symbols.

For those who are new to the site, Herms were frankly phallic statues -- this is a Herm --

which were found in every Palaistra / Fight School in the ancient world.

Palaistra: Herm on left, Boxer on right

Herms were worshipped -- worshipped at the Fight School -- and worshipped as a symbol of Male Sexuality, of Man's Creative Power, of Man's Aggressive Power.

A victorious athlete and Nike join in crowning a Herm

Manly Aggression, Manly Sexuality.

The ancients understood -- and EMPHASIZED -- the relationship between the two.

So -- there were forests of Heroic, Male, Nude statues.

And how do we know, by the way, that Pausanias was telling the truth?

Because, even though the statues are gone -- destroyed -- many of their inscribed bases are still there.

For example, I often show you this statue, of a nude, male, victor in boxing -- the most dangerous of the three Fight Sports:

Look at the base of the statue -- it's inscribed with the guy's name, and where he won his victory.

A great many of these bases have been recovered at Olympia, saying exactly and precisely what Pausanias said -- they said.

But the statues themselves are gone.

Completely and utterly destroyed.

Yet try to remember that there were literally thousands of statues like this one -- showing nude, male victors in Fight Sport -- and not just in Olympia, but in every Greek city state.

For example, this is a statue of a very famous Olympic victor named Arrachion.

The statue is very old, and it's a miracle as much of it as has survived -- as has.

It was found in a small city-state named Phigalia -- EXACTLY were Pausanias had said it would be.

So every little town or city-state had statues like these -- not just of local boys who'd made good at the Olympics, but of guys who'd won in one or more of the literally hundreds of local festivals.

There were thousands upon thousands of these statues in the ancient world.

Plus wall paintings, and vase paintings, and reliefs, and mosaics, etc -- all sending cultural messages of Heroic, Nude, Testicular, Masculinity -- to Men.

I said that these messages were both adulatory -- These guys are great! -- and hortatory -- You can be great too!

You too can be a Hero among your fellow Nude, Tescticular, Masculine Men.

That's a very different message from the sort that males hear today.

Let me talk about just two more of these statues -- two that are near and dear to my heart, two of the Warrior God Ares -- today known as the Ludovisi and Borghese Ares.

This is the Ludovisi Ares:

The Ludovisi Ares is considered to be a "very fine" Roman copy of a Greek original from around the time of Alexander the Great.

And of all the statues of Ares which have survived, it does seem to me the best -- particularly because the God is bodily and genitally intact.

He's not a disembodied head, and though there are Renaissance additions to the statue -- the sword hilt isn't original, and the nose may not be either --

most of the statue is still there.

Including, as I said, his genitals -- his penis and a big fat set of balls nestled against his thigh:

And that's how the ancients would have conceived of him -- as a Warrior, complete and whole, including his Manhood in the genital sense.

Then there's the Borghese Ares:

The Borghese Ares may or may not be a Roman copy of a Greek original -- that is to say, it may be purely Roman.

But -- let me be clear with you guys:

Even a Roman image is better than no image.

Because culturally, it's very close to Greek.

Now, as it happens, I own a very cheap copy of the Borghese Ares, which I bought years ago.

It's not a great copy, but it's relatively large -- about 2 1/2 feet high -- and of course it's genitally intact.

Right now it's on the table where I eat.

And hanging out with it is very powerful.

So -- there's an old Marxist dictum -- "Being determines consciousness."

NW keeps emphasizing how important male nudity is -- and he's right.

As he said:

Guys want to wrestle with, fight with, and compete against guys. A male can only TEST his manhood against another male. And that aggression and urge to test male-ness is derived from being born with testicles and penises.

We are Men. We have balls.

Male sexuality is displayed on the OUTSIDE of the body. It's just the way it is.

NW is right.

In the ancient world, Men were surrounded by images like the Ludovisi and Borghese Ares.

With their male sexuality -- which is also the source of their male aggression -- displayed -- as it should be.

That was their "being" -- the male genitals and male sexuality openly and proudly displayed.

And so it became their "consciousness" -- surrounded by depictions of Heroic, Aggressive, Nude, Testicular, Men -- Heroic Nudity became their consciousness and shaped the way they lived their lives, and the way they evaluated other men's lives.

Male Nudity was Good.

Heroic Male Nudity was Good.

Male Aggression was Good.

Heroic Male Aggression was Good.

Heroic Nude Male Aggression was Good.

That was their consciousness.

I often show you images of contemporary MMA fighters.

The problem with the images of the MMA fighters is that their male sexuality is hidden under layers of synthetic fabric and logos.

That hiding implies that there's something wrong with their male sexuality -- and their male aggression.

But there isn't anything wrong with it.

Nevertheless, Being determines consciousness.

When society forces us to hide our male genitals -- that hiding becomes our consciousness.

When society forces us to disown our male aggression -- that disowning becomes our consciousness.

So long as the male genitals are hidden -- there's a problem.

As a boy, I understood -- as did NW -- that this was a problem.

Earlier in this reply I mentioned my adolescent fantasy of a combative Balls against Balls love-making.

This fantasy, which began when I was thirteen, was of me Fighting another boy -- a noble and heroic boy -- wearing only jockstraps, jockstraps that had been cut so that our Balls were hanging out of them.

So our cocks were in our jocks, while our Balls were hanging free.

Which meant that our Balls were crashing and smashing together as we Fought.

Then I would hump the other guy, that other warrior, that other hero, our cocks still in our jocks, so that the sex was pure Balls on Balls.

And even after we came, I imagined, our sperm would go on Fighting in the pools formed by our abs and pecs.

That was a very powerful fantasy for me.

I say it was a fantasy.

Yet, it was a fantasy, an imagining, which had somehow reached back and connected with the ancient reality of Heroic, Nude, Testicular, Aggressive and Combative, Masculinity.

Bill Weintraub

June 4, 2010

Let's return to NW:

Second email:

Naked Wrestler

Balls make you Fight. Fight makes the Man.

Tossing is the objective of Olympic Rules/Freestyle wrestling, Ancient Greek Wrestling, Sumo, Scandinavian, Swiss, English, Scottish, Irish, Celtic, African, and Turkish Wrestling, etc. If you can toss the guy (as in fighting on the battlefield) you have a chance at stabbing him with a dagger somewhere. But it IS a man-ritual move.

In a real battle a soldier would kill the man, not toss him.

The Throw, on the other hand, is the basis of Judo, which is actually more about throws. Throwing is much more fundamental and realistic. In a street fight or hand to hand combat it would be safer and more realistic to throw the guy than to crotch-toss him.

Being in control quickly and throwing/tossing a man, is an instinctive fighting technique. Every man should know this, to be a man. It's basic.

But to be sure, this crotch-toss (as I call it) or Hip Toss as it's called is quite the wrestling ritual. No one would admit it publicly, but it is definitely a way to inflict some "harmless" ball pain on your opponent's balls in the match. It's a kind of man-testicle communication. Only Men can know this. Only Men have balls that can feel this pain in a match.

Wrestling IS about balls against balls.

Coaches will say, you're going to have to hurt the other guy to win. This move isn't going to injure the guy. If it were true that men would sustain permanent damage to their precious balls from being thrown by their crotches, it would not be allowed and regularly done around the world. (Although a FEW people HAVE actually sought to ban the crotch-toss (Hip Toss) all together, as too "dangerous.")

The reality is: MEN agree on the rules of the fight, and they know the risks. Then they fight. Then all is cool.

Every man should know this sort of thing to be a man. I think the lack of basic one-on-one confrontation technique has turned modern men, into girly-men (straight/straight identified/gay/bi/whatever they want to call themselves).

Balls make you Fight. Fight makes the Man.

Bill Weintraub

Re: Balls make you Fight. Fight makes the Man.

6-4-10

Thank you NW and -- Wow!

"man-testicle communication"

No one says it better than NW.

Let's do a little re-play:

But to be sure, this crotch-toss (as I call it) or Hip Toss as it's called is quite the wrestling ritual. No one would admit it publicly, but it is definitely a way to inflict some "harmless" ball pain on your opponent's balls in the match. It's a kind of man-testicle communication. Only Men can know this. Only Men have balls that can feel this pain in a match.

Wrestling IS about balls against balls.

Coaches will say, you're going to have to hurt the other guy to win. This move isn't going to injure the guy. If it were true that men would sustain permanent damage to their precious balls from being thrown by their crotches, it would not be allowed and regularly done around the world. (Although a FEW people HAVE actually sought to ban the crotch-toss (Hip Toss) all together, as too "dangerous.")

The reality is: MEN agree on the rules of the fight, and they know the risks. Then they fight. Then all is cool.

Every man should know this sort of thing to be a man. I think the lack of basic one-on-one confrontation technique has turned modern men, into girly-men (straight/straight identified/gay/bi/whatever they want to call themselves).

Balls make you Fight. Fight makes the Man.

Now, listen up guys.

When NW says this:

Every man should know this sort of thing to be a man.

He's telling the Truth.

But you won't listen to him -- or me.

You won't train.

You all say you want to be a Man loving another Man.

Not a femmy loving a Man but a Man Loving a Man.

But you won't do what it takes to become a MAN.

So you'll never have what you want.

NEVER.

Here's the truth of my life:

I spent ten years after I "came out" fruitlessly looking for a lover.

I was Masculine.

Intensely Masculine.

But my Masculinity was being undercut by the "gay subculture" aka analism, which denigrated it.

While elevating femmies and bottoms.

So over time, I was losing my self-confidence.

Not to mention my youth.

Then I started training.

And it was like magic.

Guys started falling out of the sky, wanting to be my lover.

That's what happened.

Of course I didn't like most of the guys who were suddenly so eager to chat me up.

But there were a lot of them.

It was about a year later that I met Brett.

Who was considered an enormous catch.

He was young, he was handsome, he was bright, he was articulate, he was committed -- and he was hot.

Very hot.

Plus he had a big dick.

And full, heavy, juicy BALLS.

Both in reality, and metaphorically.

Because Brett was a very strong, determined, take-charge guy.

Many guys were after Brett.

But I'm the guy who won him.

I wasn't handsome, I didn't have money, I was significantly older than he was.

Didn't matter.

I won.

And I met him in the context of the very training that I was promoting then and that I still promote now.

But you're too STUPID to listen.

To me -- and to NW.

And I have to wonder -- just how STUPID can you be?

And it was the same back then -- although then I was preaching to gay-identified males.

None of whom would train.

They acted as though their dicks would fall off if they threw a punch.

IT'S THE OPPOSITE.

YOUR DICK GETS HARDER WHEN YOU THROW A PUNCH.

That's what NW's telling you.

But you won't listen.

You're so STUPID and so DUMB and so SELF-IMPEDING --

Why should anyone bother with you???

I'm going to sign this post -- with my real name, not a dopey internet pseudonym -- and end with my standard "FIGHT BACK -- DONATE."

What you don't get is that "FIGHT BACK -- DONATE" is a test.

Which all of you are failing.

Just as you've failed in your lives.

And you'll continue to fail.

NW:

We are Men. We have Balls.

Balls make us Fight. Fight makes the Man.

It's a syllogism guys.

Maybe not as elegant as something by Bertrand Russell --

But hey -- it makes its point.

Men

Balls

Fight

We are Men.

Men have Balls.

Balls make us Fight.

When you won't Fight, what you're telling the world is -- you don't have Balls.

If you don't have Balls -- you're NOT a Man.

And

NO MAN WHO'S LOOKING FOR A MAN WILL EVER BE INTERESTED IN YOU.

Which means you'll be alone the rest of your life.

Here -- I'll show you:

We are Men.

We have Balls.

Balls make us Fight.

Fight makes the Man.

But

You won't Fight.

You don't have Balls.

You're not a Man.

QED.

Still don't get it?

If you're not a Man --

Why would a Man who's looking for a Man -- be interested in you?

NW: "man-testicle communication"

It's a two-way street.

When you have testicles -- other Men know it.

And when you don't -- they know that too.

That's not some Bill Weintraub fantasy.

Nor is it an NW fantasy.

FACT:

Human beings are social animals.

We live in groups, in herds, in packs.

Within those packs, the Men Hunt, the Men Fight.

Hunting and Fighting are both social activities.

They occur in all-male groups.

The male groups are formed to FACILITATE AGGRESSION.

The Men in those groups have to be able to read each other's -- balls.

Because AGGRESSION is a function of Men's BALLS.

"man-testicle communication."

Without it, human beings couldn't survive.

Men are constantly reading each other.

And you.

And when they see you don't have balls --

they lose interest.

In his last email to me before I put up this post, NW said

I'm glad that I'm no longer alone in this line of thought. The manly-loneliness of the last 40 years of my life is somehow resolving into a beautiful manly-unity of testicles, penises, pecs, abs, fight, wrestling for takedown, cock-to-cock, man-blood and man-cum.

It's so sweet.

Here are two good pix. The fight ends up in a bloody man-hug, cock2cock, pecs2pecs, abs2abs.

Fights are cool.

NW says that by being true to himself, he's gone from "the manly-loneliness of the last 40 years" -- to "a beautiful manly-unity of testicles, penises, pecs, abs, fight, wrestling for takedown, cock-to-cock, man-blood and man-cum."

You can make that journey too.

You can leave your loneliness behind, and enter the Warrior Kosmos -- the beautiful manly-unity -- of Warriorhood -- of balls, cocks, pecs, abs, fighting, wrestling, cock-to-cock, man-blood and man-cum.

You can do it.

If you try.

Bill Weintraub

June 4, 2010

© All material Copyright 2010 by Bill Weintraub. All rights reserved.

PS from NW:

I am putting together my observations of men and women where I work. I will soon do a write up of that. There is a stark contrast between the male office worker and the male blue collar worker in our area.

Like night and day.

The blue collar/proletariat guys are the warriors. MANY of them (the mechanics and such) have done underground fist fighting in the past...for years and years... The masculinity just radiates from them. They come and talk to me about it from time to time since they know I've been to MMA school.

Many of them never attended "MMA School." The are from before MMA School. They would just meet up, agree on the rules, take their shirts off. And fight. That was it. They respect MMA as a good thing, but they ridicule it as not the "pure" fighting they have done. No fancy gloves, No cups, No flashiness. It is a super sensation to mingle with this Warrior/Aristocracy now relegated to the hourly wage-earning part of the corporation(s).

And the office/cubicle dwellers are the queer-like guys who couldn't fight their way out of a paper bag (with a few real exceptions). Doesn't matter if they're married with kids or not---totally different issue.

Guys, Naked Wrestler, aka NW, has wrestled and trained in mixed martial arts, and has many very important posts on our Man2Man Alliance sites, including:

aggression and the beauty of guys;

The Warrior Male;

Total Masculinity;

The Right to Fight;

Fighter Beauty, or, A True Test of Toughness;

It takes Balls to be a Warrior;

my first shirtless wrestling opponent;

to be One with the Man I wrestle;

Forced Hetero-sexualization and the death of Man Space;

Full Mount Fight;

The Masculinity Zone;

Becoming ONE in the FIGHT: The Intimacy of Aggression;

Fighting and Freedom;

Take You On at the Pond;

our American forced Hetero-sexualized society;

Fighting is part of the Human Condition;

Men being Men;

The Masculine Male;

The Weight Room;

Wrestling Rides -- Get to know your man;

Hip Control in Pankration.

The MAN Area II

MAN SPACE;

MANBALLS;

the Man area;

balls and the man;

Fighting is good;

Freeballing is good;

Fighting is Man. Man is Good;

MANPHOBIA -- Fired for being into UFC;

balls against balls;

Fighting is Man;

The Ultimate in Man to Man; and

Cockfuckin Man to Man.

Plus replies to many posts, including

touching penises when hugging; and

Go Shirtless: In support of a brother!!